
Chapter 7 in Comp Tales addresses a pretty universal problem: public perception. No matter what you do or where you are, how the public sees you versus your true self are often at odds. I think the wide range of comp tale examples reveals that it is an interdisciplinary problem, as well as intradisciplinary and public issue.
I read a comp tale like 89 about teaching people the importance of eradicating sexist language and think, "Yea, gosh, that's so freakin' annoying how people don't understand why writing 'humankind' is more inclusive than 'mankind'!" In that instance, I feel the frustration of being someone who is obviously thinking more deeply about language that others.
However, there are also examples like 79 that reveal an ignorance on my end. I know I have critiqued work from other disciplines for things like style and voice without considering the specific criteria for that filed of study.
Probably the worst problem of public perception is with the public. Educators sacrifice a great deal to teach the future generations and share their skills with the world. But so do many other ambitions and occupations. It becomes harder and harder to do that when people either don't understand or don't care about something you are passionate about. The cycle of underappreciation perpetuates because, as comp tale 85 reveals, we don't do a good enough job of explaining what we do to others. Along with that though, we don't do a good enough job listening to what others do either.
In truth, we are all human beings, shouting into a void: I MATTER! APPRECIATE ME! And as much as we ask that of other people, we need to fulfill that desire of others. The more we validate the efforts and value of other fields, occupations, lifestyles, etc., the more we ourselves are validated. And we can stop screaming "I MATTER" and start saying, "WE MATTER."






